DIÁLOGO JUDICIAL ENTRE ÓRGANOS INTERNACIONALES DE PROTECCIÓN DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS COMO MEDIO PARA FORTALECER LA GOBERNANZA EXTRATERRITORIAL EN UN CONTEXTO POLÍTICO IMPREDECIBLE

Silviana Cocan

Autores

Silviana Cocan (GUEST ARTICLE) Universidade de Montreal

Palavras-chave:

Diálogo judicial, Interpretación, Derechos humanos, Estado de derecho

Resumo

El diálogo judicial surgió como una práctica espontánea que consiste en que un órgano internacional haga referencia a decisiones o instrumentos internacionales que son fuentes externas al sistema en el cual dicho órgano debe ejercer su poder de interpretación. Este artículo explora la noción de diálogo judicial en el orden jurídico internacional cuando se vincula con la protección efectiva de los derechos humanos. Se cuestiona el diálogo judicial como un método complementario de interpretación de los instrumentos y principios de derechos humanos, así como una herramienta para alcanzar una judicatura internacional a pesar de los múltiples sistemas jurídicos concebidos como independientes. El artículo analiza el desarrollo del diálogo judicial en el orden jurídico internacional, su papel en la gobernanza extraterritorial y sus interacciones con el contexto político que influye en la mplementación efectiva de los derechos humanos en los órdenes jurídicos internos.

Biografia do Autor

Silviana Cocan (GUEST ARTICLE), Universidade de Montreal

_{Doctorat en droit international Université Laval (Canada), Université de Bordeaux (France), Maîtrise en droit international Université de Bordeaux (France), Licence en droit public general Université Montpellier I (France)}

Referências

ALLARD, Julie; VAN DEN EYNDE, Laura. Le dialogue des jurisprudences comme source du droit: arguments entre idéalisation et scepticisme. In: HACHEZ, Isabelle (ed.). Les sources du droit revisitées. v. 3. Bruxelles: Anthemis, 2013.

BURCHARD, Christoph. Judicial Dialogue in Light of Comparative Criminal Law and Justice. In: LOBBA, Paolo; MARINIELLO, Triestino (eds.). Judicial Dialogue on Human Rights: The Practice of International Criminal Tribunals. Leiden: Brill, 2017.

BURGORGUE-LARSEN, Laurence. Decompartmentalization: The key technique for interpreting regional human rights treaties. International Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 16, n. 1, p. 187-213, 2018.

CANÇADO TRINDADE, Antonio Augusto. The Merits of Coordination of International Courts on Human Rights. Journal of International Criminal Justice, v. 2, n. 2, p. 309-312, 2004.

CHETAIL, Vincent. Armed Conflict and Forced Migration: A Systematic Approach to International Humanitarian Law, Refugee Law, and International Human Rights Law. In: CLAPHAM, Andrew; GAETA, Paola (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of International Law in

Armed Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

COHEN, Harlan Grant. International Precedent and the Practice of International Law. In: HELFAND, Michael A. (ed.). Negotiating State and Non-State Law: The Challenge of Globaland Local Legal Pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

DEPREZ, Christophe. Article 21(3) of the ICC Statute and ‘Internationally Recognized Human Rights’ as a Source of Mandatory Judicial Dialogue. In: LOBBA, Paolo; MARINIELLO, Triestino (eds.). Judicial Dialogue on Human Rights: The Practice of International Criminal Tribunals. Leiden: Brill, 2017.

DROEGE, Cordula. Elective affinities? Human rights and humanitarian law. International Review of the Red Cross, v. 90, n. 871, p. 501-548, 2008.

DUBOUT, Édouard; TOUZÉ, Sébastien (eds.). Les droits fondamentaux: charnières entre ordres et systèmes juridiques. Paris: Pedone, 2010.

FAHLBUSCH, Markus. Le rôle du dialogue des juges dans la formation de standards de protection des droits de l’Homme. In: DISANT, Mathieu; LEWKOWICZ, Gregory; TÜRK, Pauline (eds.). Les standards constitutionnels mondiaux. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2018.

FERRER MAC-GREGOR, Eduardo. What do we mean when we talk about judicial reflections of a judge of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Harvard Human Rights Journal, v. 30, p. 89-128, 2017.

FERRER MAC-GREGOR, Eduardo. Le développement du corpus juris interaméricain à travers l’action prétorienne de la Cour Interaméricaine des droits l’Homme. In: BURGORGUE

LARSEN, Laurence (ed.). Les défis de l’interprétation et de l’application des droits de l’Homme – De l’ouverture du dialogue. Paris: Pedone, 2017.

FITZMAURICE, Malgosia. Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties. In: SHELTON, Dinah (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.

FRENCH, Duncan. Treaty interpretation and the incorporation of extraneous legal rules. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, v. 55, n. 2, p. 281-314, 2006.

FRYDMAN, Benoît. Conclusion: Le dialogue des juges et la perspective idéale d’une justice universelle. In: Le dialogue des juges – Actes du colloque organisé le 28 avril 2006 à l’Université Libre de Bruxelles. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2007.

GAETA, Paola. Does President Al Bashir Enjoy Immunity from Arrest? Journal of International Criminal Justice, v. 7, n. 2, p. 315-332, 2009.

GARDBAUM, Stephen. Human Rights as International Constitutional Rights. European Journal of International Law, v. 19, n. 4, p. 749-768, 2008.

GLENN, H. Patrick. Persuasive Authority. McGill Law Journal, v. 32, n. 2, p. 262-298, 1987.

GONDEK, Michal. The Reach of Human Rights in a Globalising World: Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2009.

GROPPI, Tania; PONTHOREAU, Marie-Claire. The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges. Oxford: Hart Publishing Limited, 2013.

JAQUEMET, Stephane. The cross-fertilization of international humanitarian law and international refugee law. Revue internationale de la Croix Rouge, v. 83, n. 843, p. 651-673, 2001.

JIMENEZ SOLARES, Elba. Las normas internacionales convencionales de derechos humanos y su contribución al orden público internacional. Revista de Derecho UNED, v. 14, p. 325-347, 2014.

JOINT SAN JOSÉ DECLARATION I. Adopted on July 18, 2018. Disponível em: <https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/San_Jose_Declaration_2018_ENG>. Acesso em: 25 mar. 2026.

JOINT SAN JOSÉ DECLARATION II. Adopted on May 25-26, 2023. Disponível em: <https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/san_jose_declaration_2023_eng>. Acesso em: 25 mar. 2026.

JONES, Annika. Judicial Cross-Referencing and the Identity of the International Criminal Court. North Carolina Journal of International Law, v. 43, n. 1, p. 72-129, 2018.

KELLER, Helen; STONE SWEET, Alec (eds.). A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECtHR on National Legal Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

MACULAN, Elena. Judicial Dialogue and the Definition of Torture: The importation of ICTs from European Jurisprudence. In: LOBBA, Paolo; MARINIELLO, Triestino (eds.). Judicial Dialogue on Human Rights: The Practice of International Criminal Tribunals. Leiden: Brill, 2017.

MACULAN, Elena. Judicial definition of torture as a paradigm of cross-fertilisation. Combining harmonisation and expansion. Nordic Journal of International Law, v. 84, n. 2, p. 456-481, 2015.

MEDINA QUIROGA, Cecilia. The Role of International Tribunals: Law-Making or Creative Interpretation? In: SHELTON, Dinah (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.

MCLACHLAN, Campbell. The principle of systemic integration and article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, v. 54, n. 2, p. 279-320, 2005.

ORAKHELASHVILI, Alexander. State Immunity and Hierarchy of Norm: Why the House of Lords Got It Wrong. European Journal of International Law, v. 18, n. 5, p. 955-970, 2007.

ORAKHELASHVILI, Alexander. State Immunity and International Public Order. German Yearbook of International Law, v. 45, p. 226-257, 2002.

PETERS, Anne. The refinement of international law: from fragmentation to regime interaction and politicization. International Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 15, n. 3, p. 671-704, 2017.

PETERSMANN, Ernst-Ulrich. Constitutional Justice Requires Judicial Cooperation and Comity in the Protection of Rule of Law. In: FONTANELLI, Filippo; MARTINICO, Giuseppe; CARROZZA, Paolo (eds.). Shaping Rule of Law Through Dialogue. Groningen/Amsterdam:

Europa Law Publishing, 2010.

PINTO, Mónica. El principio pro homine. Criterios de la hermenéutica y pautas para la regulación de los derechos humanos. In: La aplicación de los tratados sobre derechos humanos por los tribunales locales. Buenos Aires: Ediciones del Puerto, 1997.

ROMANO, Cesare. Deciphering the Grammar of the International Jurisprudential Dialogue. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, v. 41, n. 4, p. 755-787, 200

SIMMA, Bruno; PULKOWSKI, Dirk. Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law. European Journal of International Law, v. 17, n. 3, p. 483-529, 2006.

SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. A Typology of Transjudicial Communication. University of Richmond Law Review, v. 29, n. 1, p. 99-137, 1994.

SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. A Global Community of Courts. Harvard International Law Journal, v. 44, n. 1, p. 191-219, 2003.

STAES, Dorothea. The importation of ‘external sources’ by the European Court of Human Rights: Opportunities and challenges in light of legal certainty. In: ARCARI, Maurizio;

BALMOND, Louis (eds.). Le dialogue des juridictions dans l’ordre juridique international: Entre pluralisme et sécurité juridique. Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 2014.

TZANAKOPOULOS, Antonios. Provisional measures indicated by international courts: emergence of a general principle of international law. Revue hellénique de droit international, v. 57, n. 1, p. 53-84, 2004.

ULFSTEIN, Geir. Towards an International Human Rights Judiciary? In: EBBESSON, Jonas;

JACOBSSON, Marie; KLAMBERG, Mark Adam; LANGLET, David; WRANGE, Pal (eds.). International Law and Changing Perceptions of Security – Liber Amicorum Said Mahmoudi. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV, 2014.

VAN ALEEBEK, Rosanne. The judicial dialogue between the ICJ and International Criminal

Courts on the Question of Immunity. In: VAN DEN HERIK, Larissa; STAHN, Carsten (eds.). The Diversification and Fragmentation of International Criminal Law. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill, 2012.

ZAMMIT BORDA, Aldo. The Notion of ‘Persuasive Value’ of External Precedent in International Criminal Law. Nordic Journal of International Law, v. 84, n. 1, p. 29-58, 2015.